Legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata
The female moth lays eggs individually on the shoots of young brinjal plants. The small larvae that emerge soon eat their way into the tender growing shoots where they are protected from larval parasitoids and natural enemies such as ants and beetles. The feeding activity of the larvae causes the young shoots to droop in a characteristic manner
Maruca vitrata - larva |
Maruca vitrata - adult |
Analysis of M. vitrata pheromone using insects from India and Bangladesh
The results of a linked gas chromatography - electroantennography (GC-EAG) analysis of male Maruca vitrata EAG responses to a blend of synthetic compounds separated on a polar Wax GC column is shown in Figure 1. The synthetic blend contained 10ng each of dodecyl, tetradecyl, hexadecyl and octadecyl acetate standards and (E)-10-hexadecenal (E10-16:Ald) and EE10,12-16:Ald. The GC outlet was split 50 : 50 between the EAG and GC detectors, thus the male EAG preparation was exposed to 5 ng of each compound. The EAG preparation was exposed to material eluting from the GC at 5 sec intervals for 3 sec resulting in a series of EAG responses (negative peaks). The only EAG responses larger than the background were elicited by E10-16:Ald and EE10,12-16:Ald at 14.2 and 17.5 min.


Figure 1. Linked GC-EAG chromatograms of male Maruca vitrata EAG responses to a blend of synthetic compounds separated on a polar Wax GC column.
Related experiments were conducted with a series of ovipositor extracts prepared from field collected insects provided by BARI. Significant EAG responses were observed at the GC retention times of EE10,12-16:Ald (Figures 2a and b) and E10-16:Ald (not shown) and these were confirmed by analysing synthetic compounds against the same male EAG preparation (Figure 2c).
GC-MS analyses of the natural samples were unable to confirm the presence of any pheromone compounds suggesting the amounts present were less than 100 pg per female equivalent. The reasons for the low pheromone titer are uncertain. No additional EAG responses were identified although there was a suggestion of a response in the hexadecen-1-ol position.


Figure 2.a


Figure 2b


Figure 2c. Three GC-EAG linked analyses showing EAG responses to both natural pheromone extracts (a and b) and synthetic (c) EE10, 12-16:Ald.
Preliminary field trials with putative sex pheromone components were conducted in India by Downham et al. (2003) and although only a few insects were caught they suggested that blends of E10-16:Ald, EE1012-16:Ald and EE10,12-16:OH were attractive. Field trials were conducted in farmers’ country bean crops near BARI RARS, Jessore and Joydebpur during 2003 and 2004, to test the putative pheromone components at 100 µg dose with or without aluminium foil around the lures to minimise the effects of sunlight. Significant but low catches were obtained in traps baited with a number of the blends tested, and catches were higher in traps baited with protected lures. However, there were no clear trends between results from each of the trials or the composition of blends tested although a binary blend of 3 : 100 E10-16:Ald and EE10,12-16:Ald caught consistently in all trials.
Development of floral attractant for M. vitrata
Previous research conducted at NRI identified attractant compounds for H. armigera derived from African marigold, T. erecta and sweet pea, Lathyrus odoratus (Bruce and Cork 2001; Bruce et al., 200*). The T. erecta blend contained benzaldehyde, (±)-linalool, phenylacetaldehyde and (S)-(-)-limonene, and the L. odoratus blend contained (-)-linalool, phenylacetaldehyde, benzyl alcohol and diacetone (4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone) in their natural ratios. Given that mature crops of L. purpureus is perpetually in flower in order to attract either H. armigera or M. vitrata to an odour-baited attractant a blend or blends of compounds had to be identified that was sufficiently distinct from the background odour to remain attractive. Inevitably such a blend would not necessarily be effective in other crops, thus trials were conducted in L. purpureus, chickpea, Cicer arietinium and tomato,Lycopersicon esculentum in order to assess the prospects for developing a blend or blends of compounds that would be effective in target crops. Table 1 shows typical data with blend 1 attracting almost as many H. armigera as the male pheromone and M. vitrata being attracted equally to all blends tested. Interestingly, three M. vitrata were caught by the H. armigera pheromone trap.
Table 1. Mean number of insects attracted and caught with floral attractants in country bean fields, Jessore, 2004
Treatments |
Number of days |
Total number of H. armigera |
Total number of M. vitrata |
Floral blend 1 |
32 |
12 |
15 |
Floral blend 2 |
32 |
5 |
16 |
Floral blend 3 |
32 |
3 |
16 |
Floral blend 4 |
32 |
9 |
18 |
Floral blend 5 |
32 |
6 |
17 |
HA Pheromone |
32 |
19 |
3 |
Significant progress has been made since the early trials but a fully optimised blend has not yet been developed.
H. armigera larva on bean |
H. armigera larva on bud |
H. armigera moths in pheromone trap |
Floral bait in water trap |
Development of a bio-rational IPM package against pod borer complex
Farmers spray different types of insecticides at very high frequency and dose on country bean to control the pod borer pest complex, typically every alternative day. Nevertheless, it was observed that at the same time as applying insecticide some farmers hand-picked infested flowers and pods. Earlier research had suggested that the application of insecticide did not significantly reduce infestation but in order to develop a management strategy that would be acceptable to farmers a combination of insecticides, hand picking and a biopesticides, neem kernel seed extract (NSKE) and H. armigera nucleopolyhedrovirus (HaNPV), were tested. These trials were conducted during the summers of 2004 and 2005 at Joydebpur and at Jessore. The experiments were laid out in randomised complete block design with three replications. There were six treatments during 2004 and seven treatments during 2005 which were as follows:
T1 = Insecticide spray (Cypermethrin) @ 1.0 ml/L of water at 15 day intervals
T2 = Insecticide spray (as T1) + hand picking (twice a week)
T3 = HaNPV spray @ 0.4 ml/l of water at 10 day intervals
T4 = HaNPV spray + hand picking (twice a week)
T5 = Hand picking (twice a week)
T6 = Untreated control
T7 = Neem seed kernel extract was applied ( 500 g/10 l) at 10 day intervals + hand picking every alternate day (2005 only).
During each harvest the number and weight of healthy and infested fruits were counted and recorded. The percent fruit infestation by number and weight was calculated from recorded data.
Percentage infestation in the untreated check was found to be significantly higher than that recorded in treatment plots apart from the HaNPV application alone (T3) at Joydebpur which probably reflected the fact that HaNPV had no effect on M. vitrata. Significantly lower infestation levels were observed in the insecticide treated plots (T1) and plots where hand picking of infested flowers and pods was practiced as the sole means of control. Combining hand picking with either insecticide or HaNPV appeared to result in significantly lower damage levels compared to insecticide or HaNPV alone. NSKE was effective when used in combination with hand picking although there was no significant difference between hand picking alone and in combination with application of NSKE.
Hand picking of infested pods and flowers resulted in yields double the untreated check and they were further increased when combined with insecticide or NSKE. HaNPV in the absence of hand picking was the least effective means of control of the pod borer complex, as might be expected bewcuase M. vitrata was the predominant pod borer pest in all plots.
Although labour intensive, hand picking requires no input costs, apart from labour, and given that NSKE is inexpensive impacts on all species of the borer complex the combination provides the basis for a low-cost, sustainable intervention that would be acceptable to farmers. Research is continuing to develop flroal attractants to control the adult stages of the pests however the research has already identified the basis of a technology package that will provide farmers with a viable alternative to the use of toxic pesticides.
References
Bruce, T.J. & Cork, A. (2001) Identification of attractants from flowers of African marigold, Tagetes erecta, for female bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27, 1119-1131.
Burguiere, L., Marion-Poll, F & Cork, A.. (2001) Electrophysiological responses of female Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) to synthetic odours. Journal of Insect Physiology, 47, 509-514.
Downham, M. C. A., Hall, D. R., Chamberlain, D. J., Cork, A., Farman, D. I., tamò, M., Dahounto, D., Datinon, B. & Adetonah, S. (2003) Minor components in the sex pheromone of legume podborer, Maruca vitrata (F.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): Development of an attractive blend. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 29, 989-1011.
Plume moth. Larvae attack country bean |
Bean consumed by Lepidopterous borer |
Predator - Dragonfly |
Pollinator - Bee |